Mutton, Yards. Age., & Gilbride, K. During the W. click over here now Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and in conflict relationships (pp. 33-60). Ny: Springer-Verlag. [ Website links ]
Lee, L., Loewenstein, Grams., Ariely, D., Hong, J., & Young, J. (2008). If I am not gorgeous, are you currently beautiful or otherwise not?: Physical-attractiveness product reviews and relationships needs given that a purpose of an individual’s own elegance. Psychological Technology, 19, 669677. [ Backlinks ]
Levinger, Grams., & Rands, Yards. (1985)patibility in-marriage or any other close dating. When you look at the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you may incompatible relationships (pp. 309-331). Nyc: Springer-Verlag. [ Website links ]
Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. (1944). Amount of ambition. Inside the J. McV. Search (Ed.), Personality together with decisions issues (Vol. step 1, pp. 333378). New york: Ronald Force. [ Website links ]
Loving, T. J. (2006). Predicting relationships dating fate that have insiders’ and you can outsiders’ angle: Just who and you can what exactly is asked things. Personal Relationship, thirteen, 349-362. [ Hyperlinks ]
Luo, S., & Klohnen, Elizabeth. C. (2005). Assortative mating and you will marital top quality in the newly wedded couples: A couple of built approach. Journal off Identification and Societal Therapy, 88, 304-326. [ Hyperlinks ]
Lutz-Zois, C. J., Bradley, A. C., Mihalik, J. L., & Moorman-Eavers, Age. R. (2006). Recognized similarity and you will relationship achievement among relationship people: An idiographic approach. [ Hyperlinks ]
Madden, M., & Lenhart, A. (2006). Dating. Washington, DC: Report on Pew Sites & American Lifestyle Investment. Recovered , off [ Hyperlinks ]
MacDonald, T. K., & Ross, Meters. (1999). Evaluating the precision of predictions throughout the relationships relationship: Just how and why manage lovers’ predictions vary from men and women from observers? Personality and you may Public Mindset Bulletin, twenty-five, 14171429. [ Website links ]
ater, J., & Smith, S. (1982). Legitimizing issues in the initiation regarding heterosexual relationships. Papers shown at First In the world Conference on the Personal Relationship, Madison, WI. [ Links ]
Log out-of Societal and personal Relationship, 23, 865-880
Montoya, R. Yards., Horton, R. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Try actual similarity essential appeal? An excellent meta-data of real and you can observed resemblance. Journal regarding Public and personal Dating, 25, 889-922. [ Backlinks ]
Digital relationship and you can virtual related: Conceptualizing computers mediated personal matchmaking
Morry, M. M. (2005). Relationships pleasure since a good predictor regarding similarity recommendations; An examination of destination-resemblance hypothesis. Diary out of Personal and personal Dating, twenty two, 561-584. [ Website links ]
Morry, Meters. Meters. (2007). Brand new destination-similarity hypothesis certainly get across-sex friends: Dating pleasure, identified similarities, and you can care about-helping attitudes. Journal away from Social and private Dating, twenty four, 117-138. [ Hyperlinks ]
Murstein, B. I. (1987). A clarification and you can expansion of one’s SVR principle off dyadic pairing. Journal away from ily, forty two, 929-947. [ Backlinks ]
Orbuch, T. L., Veroff, J. Hassan, H., & Horrocks, J. (2002). Who can separation: Good fourteen-year longitudinal study of black lovers and you can light people. Journal away from Public and personal Matchmaking, 19, 179-202. [ Backlinks ]
Orenstein, S. (). The latest like algorithm Meets believes it’s found a formula to own governing the web based relationships business: A scientific strategy to find Mr. otherwise Ms. Right. Business dos.0 Mag. Recovered for the off [ Backlinks ]
Rammstedt, B., & Schupp, J. (2008). Just the congruent survive – Identification parallels when you look at the lovers. Personality and you will Private Distinctions, forty-five, 533-535. [ Backlinks ]
Regan, P. C., Levin, L., Sprecher, S., Christopher, S., & Cate, R. (2000). Lover tastes: Exactly what attributes would someone notice within their short-title sexual and much time-term close couples? Diary from Mindset and Person Sexuality, a dozen, 1-21. [ Links ]
Reis, H. T. (1985). The latest role of notice regarding initiation and course of personal communications. From inside the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible matchmaking (pp. 209-231). Ny: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Backlinks ]